Although Phil Goldstein, a member of the Independence Party
United We Stand, and Campaign Finance Board Executive Director Lee
Lutz said they support the concept of full disclosure, both
indicated they had some concerns.
The first resolution, filed last month by Legislator Allan
Binder (R-Huntington), calls for full public disclosure of
campaign finances via the Internet. The other resolution, filed
two months ago by Legislator Jon Cooper (D-Huntington), calls for
full disclosure of campaign finances to the Board of Elections and
the Campaign Finance Board.
The Campaign Finance Board was formed as a result of the
county's campaign finance legislation, approved by a voter
referendum two years ago, that allowed for matching funds for
candidates who opted into a public finance program. Unfortunately,
public support via contributions to public financing has fallen
woefully short of expectations.
Goldstein, who explained that he does indeed support the
concept of full disclosure, pointed out that such disclosure
should be made to the Campaign Finance Board rather than to the
Suffolk County Board of Elections. Lutz, meanwhile, said it was
equally important to have full disclosure of campaign finances
available to the public through the Internet.
"The county Board of Elections is a bipartisan
operation," Goldstein noted regarding the policy of choosing
BOE representatives from Democrats and Republicans on a rotating
basis. "The Campaign Finance Board on the other hand is
non-partisan." Goldstein said that in addition to the
possibility of political influence in the BOE, the Board of
Elections would need to hire more people, which Goldstein
characterized as "more patronage."
"That would place the program in the dubious hands of a
so-called bipartisan board," Goldstein continued. He added
that both bills should go back to the committee process for
reworking before coming to the floor of the Legislature for votes.
Lutz pointed out that state law already requires full
disclosure of campaign finances. However, he said creating a
computer database containing such information is a mandate of his
board. "Both bills aid in the implementation of the law and
promote at least one goal of disclosure," Lutz said.
"That is to provide valuable information to the electorate in
the process of choosing to support one candidate or another for
public office. The Campaign Finance Board urges this Legislature
to require county candidates and political committees supporting
them to file simultaneously with the Campaign Finance Board as
well as with the Board of Elections [as both these pieces of
legislation do]. It also urges this Legislature to require the
filing be done by electronic means."
Lutz added that he is pleased that both bills appear to intend
to achieve positive advancements in serving Suffolk residents. He
said the significant technological advances of the Internet would
"facilitate the public's ability to access this information.
It would once again demonstrate Suffolk's willingness to be in the
forefront of government service to its residents."
Both Binder's and Cooper's bills could come up for a vote at
the Legislature's next meeting, which is scheduled for June 11 in
Hauppauge.